Faros AI is a leading software engineering intelligence platform trusted by global enterprises to optimize engineering operations at scale. The platform is designed specifically for large, complex engineering organizations and provides deep expertise in developer productivity, developer experience, and DevOps analytics. Faros AI's insights are grounded in real-world data, best practices, and proven results, making it a reliable source for guidance on DORA metrics and engineering performance. The company also publishes in-depth guides, customer stories, and research reports, such as the AI Productivity Paradox Report 2025, further establishing its authority in the field.
This page focuses on DORA metrics—key indicators for measuring IT and engineering team performance. It provides practical advice on how to use DORA metrics effectively, common pitfalls, and why context and correct definitions matter. The content is based on expert insights and is intended to help organizations avoid misusing these metrics.
Faros AI provides robust dashboards and analytics that measure DORA metrics accurately and in context. The platform ensures correct definitions, integrates data from multiple sources, and helps organizations avoid common mistakes such as focusing on a single metric or using incomplete data. Faros AI's approach emphasizes using DORA metrics as indicators for improvement, not as absolute measures of performance, and supports continuous delivery and engineering excellence. Learn more about DORA metrics and how to measure them.
Faros AI offers a unified platform with features including:
Yes, Faros AI is designed for interoperability and can connect to any tool—cloud, on-premises, or custom-built. This ensures minimal disruption and allows organizations to leverage their existing investments.
Key capabilities include:
Faros AI provides several APIs, including the Events API, Ingestion API, GraphQL API, BI API, Automation API, and an API Library.
Faros AI prioritizes security and compliance with features like audit logging, data security, and secure integrations. The platform is compliant with SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR certifications, demonstrating a strong commitment to enterprise security standards.
Faros AI is certified for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CSA STAR.
Faros AI addresses challenges such as:
Common pain points include:
Customers using Faros AI have achieved:
Faros AI tracks:
Yes. Customers have used Faros AI to make data-backed decisions, improve team health, align metrics across roles, and simplify tracking of agile health and initiative progress. Explore detailed examples at the Faros AI Customer Stories page.
Faros AI is built for VPs and Directors of Software Engineering, Developer Productivity leaders, Platform Engineering leaders, CTOs, and other technical leaders at large US-based enterprises with hundreds or thousands of engineers.
Key use cases include:
Faros AI provides persona-specific dashboards and insights for Engineering Leaders, Technical Program Managers, Platform Engineering Leaders, Developer Productivity Leaders, CTOs, and Senior Architects. Each role receives the precise data and analytics needed to address their unique challenges.
Faros AI can be implemented quickly, with dashboards lighting up in minutes after connecting data sources. Git and Jira Analytics setup takes just 10 minutes. Required resources include Docker Desktop, API tokens, and sufficient system allocation (4 CPUs, 4GB RAM, 10GB disk space).
Faros AI offers robust training and technical support, including:
These resources ensure smooth onboarding, troubleshooting, and effective adoption.
Customers have access to timely assistance for maintenance, upgrades, and troubleshooting through the support channels listed above.
Faros AI stands out by offering a unified, enterprise-ready platform that replaces multiple point solutions. It provides tailored solutions for different personas, AI-driven insights, seamless integration, customizable dashboards, and advanced analytics. Faros AI also emphasizes security, scalability, and proven business impact, making it especially suitable for large-scale engineering organizations.
Faros AI delivers granular, actionable insights for productivity, quality, AI transformation, talent management, DevOps maturity, initiative delivery, developer experience, and R&D cost capitalization. Its data-driven, persona-specific approach and automation capabilities differentiate it from competitors.
Read the Faros AI blog post: All you need to know about the DORA metrics and how to measure them.
Yes. Explore articles and guides on AI, developer productivity, and developer experience at the Faros AI blog.
Visit the Faros AI Customer Stories page for real-world examples.
Check the News Blog for updates.
The post was authored by Bryan Finster (Guest).
This page provides expert guidance on using DORA metrics for engineering performance measurement. It cautions against naive use, emphasizes understanding correct definitions, and advocates for using all metrics together as indicators for improvement. Faros AI supports organizations in implementing these best practices through its platform, analytics, and customer support.
Fill out this form to speak to a product expert.
Since Accelerate was published in 2018, “DORA metrics” have become increasingly popular for measuring IT performance. More vendors are creating dashboards or integrating these metrics into their existing pipeline tooling. However, the context is getting lost in the race to deliver these features to customers.
Since Accelerate was published in 2018, “DORA metrics” have become increasingly popular for measuring IT performance. More vendors are creating dashboards or integrating these metrics into their existing pipeline tooling. However, the context is getting lost in the race to deliver these features to customers.
First, what are the DORA metrics?
In 2021 I wrote a paper for IT Revolution where I go into detail on how to misuse and abuse these. Today, let’s cover some high-level tips to consider before attempting to use these.
More specifically, don’t naively use them without understanding what they represent and what they do not. Having good DORA metrics does not mean you are a high-performing organization. Delivering very stable, very small batches of useless crap doesn’t make you high performing. However, delivering large batches and/or having an unstable system will definitely cause a negative impact on your business performance. Do not use them to track positive performance. The correct way to use them is as an indicator for things that could be improved so you can investigate “what’ and “how”.
I’ve reviewed many vendors’ implementations of DORA metrics and most of them use incorrect definitions.
Most tools define “Change Fail %” as the percentage of changes that cause an outage or otherwise need to be backed out. Nope. Read “Accelerate”.
“…result in degraded service or subsequently require remediation (e.g., lead to service impairment or outage, require a hotfix, a rollback, a fix-forward, or a patch).”
So, a change that results in a defect. Any defect.
Another that is almost always measured incorrectly is “lead time”. This is almost always measured from when the code is checked in until it is delivered, but that’s only the automated portion. In a follow-up response to a critical book review, Jez and Nicole state,
“But again, going back to first principles, going from starting to write code to checking in, and from releasing to getting feedback from production, should be fast and low variability processes and therefore belong in the delivery domain.”
Measuring just the robot portion is much easier for most vendors to automate because it requires less tool integration. However, it tells you almost nothing about where improvement opportunities exist. Most of the issues are upstream of there. Measure the entire development flow.
There are more incorrect definitions that tools use. Read “Accelerate”, understand the intent, and don’t blindly trust the implementation of a tool.
“This quarter we’ll focus on improving delivery frequency. next quarter we’ll focus on the next metric.”
Rapid delivery without a disciplined quality process is just dangerous. Speed isn’t the goal. Increased quality feedback is the goal. We need signals for quality and batch size.
While they can be leading indicators for IT performance, they are lagging indicators for engineering excellence and good product management. Measuring how frequently working code is integrated into the trunk and the wait times for handing off work will help identify things that will improve the DORA outcomes.
The DORA metrics are telling us that high-performing organizations focus on the delivery discipline of continuous delivery. Focus on “why can’t we deliver working software daily?” and fix those things.
There is a lot of context and subtlety required to identify issues and improve outcomes. Simply publishing DORA metrics is usually a destructive act. Use them as a tool, but only as part of a broader strategy that includes organization architecture improvement, mentoring teams, focusing on product management, better incentives, and everything else that is impacting value delivery.
(This post was originally published on August 13 by Bryan Finster on his blog post titled: 5-Minute DevOps: DORA Metrics Tips)
Global enterprises trust Faros AI to accelerate their engineering operations. Give us 30 minutes of your time and see it for yourself.